U.S. Municipal Solid Waste Management Market – 2.2% Growth Forecast from 2020 to 2026

The U.S. municipal solid waste management market is estimated to observe considerable growth owing to surging production of waste from developing urban sectors. Growing concerns over environmental degradation and hazardous impact of untreated waste on safety and health of humans have compelled the U.S. government to promote the idea of solid waste management. Shifting focus towards sustainable solid waste management practices due to their environmental benefits could massively aid business outlook in the future.

Over the last few years, numerous studies have hinted that open dumping has the ability to severely affect the health of people living nearby. This has led to the introduction of strict norms, influencing waste management agencies to minimize open dumping practices by adopting sophisticated waste treatment systems for recycling. 

Get sample copy of this research report @ https://www.decresearch.com/request-sample/detail/2953

The U.S. municipal solid waste management market is expected to garner lucrative gains on account of surging amount of waste generated from expanding urban population. Growing concerns over environmental degradation and harmful effects of untreated waste on safety and health has compelled the U.S. government to promote the idea of solid waste management. Shifting focus towards sustainable solid waste management practices owing to their environmental benefits may massively aid business outlook.

Over the years, numerous studies have indicated that open dumping could severely affect the health of people living nearby. This has led to the introduction of strict norms, influencing waste management agencies to minimize open dumping practices by adopting sophisticated waste treatment systems for recycling.

Waste management agencies are preferring sustainable model over traditional landfilling alternatives. Ecological viability of treatment practices like combustion, recycling, and anaerobic digestion could advance the technology demand.

The residential sector of the U.S. is meanwhile set to drive significance to municipal solid waste management systems as consumers incline to spend more on packaged & manufactured goods. Additionally, imposition of multiple federal mandates to lower the adverse impact of illegal trash dumping could stimulate the demand for these systems across the U.S.

Proliferating demand for metallic products & hardware across the United States could accelerate the adoption of solid waste management services. Ferrous metals are usually non-biodegradable and act as a toxic agent for micro-organisms, thereby leading to the demand for a more effective waste management solution than landfills. This could boost the adoption of advanced waste treatment technologies like recycling, the most preferred waste disposal system for metal wastes.

Companies operating in the U.S. municipal solid waste management market are constantly focusing on advancing their R&D projects to develop a more comprehensive and advanced system for effective waste management.

Request for customization @ https://www.decresearch.com/roc/2953

Currently, companies like Recology, Xcel Energy Inc., Covanta Holding Corp., Wheelabrator Technologies Inc., Veolia Environnement SA, Waste Management Inc., and Sims Metal Management are advancing in the regional industry by introducing new and effective waste management models.

Table of Contents (ToC) of the report:

Chapter 3    U.S. Municipal Solid Waste Management Market Insights

3.1    Industry segmentation

3.2    Industry landscape, 2015 – 2026 (USD Million)

3.3    Industry ecosystem analysis

3.3.1    Vendor Matrix

3.4    Innovation and sustainability

3.4.1    Suez Environnement

3.4.2    Covanta Corporation

3.4.3    Wheelabrator Technologies

3.4.4    Clean Harbors

3.4.5    Waste Management, Inc

3.4.6    Veolia

3.4.7    CP Group

3.5    Regulatory landscape

3.5.1    Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)

3.5.2    Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965

3.5.3    Resource Recovery Act of 1970

3.5.4    Federal Regulations

3.5.4.1    Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

3.5.4.1.1    42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq. (1976)

3.5.4.1.2    Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992

3.5.4.1.3    Land Disposal Program Flexibility Act of 1996

3.5.5    State Regulations

3.5.5.1    Alabama

3.5.5.1.1    Alabama Act

3.5.5.1.2    Solid Wates and Recyclable Materials Management Act (SWRMMA)

3.5.5.2    California

3.5.5.2.1    California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery

3.5.5.2.2    Senate Bill

3.5.5.2.3    SABRC

3.5.5.3    Connecticut

3.5.5.3.1    CTDEEP

3.5.5.4    Delaware

3.5.5.4.1    Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA)

3.5.5.4.2    Statewide Solid Waste Management Plan (SSWMP)

3.5.5.4.3    Environmental Regulation of MSW

3.5.5.4.4    Differential Disposal Fee Program (DDFP)

3.5.5.4.5    Recycle Delaware

3.5.5.4.6    Curbside Recycling Program

3.5.5.5    Indiana

3.5.5.5.1    Indiana Recycling Coalition

3.5.5.6    North Carolina

3.5.5.6.1    Scrap Tire Management Program

3.5.5.6.2    White Goods Management Program

3.5.5.6.3    Abandoned Manufactured Homes (AMH) Program

3.5.5.7    Michigan

3.5.5.7.1    Solid Waste Policy 2017

3.5.5.7.2    Environmental Protection Act

3.5.5.7.3    Recycling Initiative

3.5.5.8    Nevada

3.5.5.8.1    Solid Waste Management Plan

3.5.5.9    Ohio

3.5.5.9.1    Ohio House Bill 592 (HB 592)

3.5.5.9.2    State Solid Waste Management Plan

3.5.5.10    Minnesota

3.5.5.10.1    Minnesota Waste Management Act

3.5.5.10.2    Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act

3.5.5.11    Arkansas

3.5.5.12    Louisiana

3.5.5.13    Texas

3.5.5.14    Florida

3.5.5.14.1    Florida Rules Related to Recycling

3.5.5.14.2    Florida Statutes Regarding Recycling

3.5.5.15    Wisconsin

3.5.5.16    Illinois

3.5.5.16.1    Solid Waste Management Act (415 ILCS 20/1 et seq.)

3.5.5.16.2    Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act (415 ILCS 15/1 et seq.)

3.5.5.16.3    Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/1 et seq.)

3.5.5.16.4    Mercury Thermostat Collection Act (415 ILCS 98/1 et seq.)

3.5.5.16.5    Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act

3.5.5.17    Kansas

3.5.5.17.1    Kansas Solid Waste Management Plan

3.5.5.18    New Jersey

3.5.5.18.1    Statewide Mandatory Source Separation and Recycling Act

3.5.5.19    Pennsylvania

3.5.5.19.1    Municipal Waste Planning, Recycling and Waste Reduction Act

3.6    U.S. landfill gate fee

3.7    MSW generation & household spending analysis

3.8    COVID – 19 impact on the overall industry outlook, 2020- 2026

3.8.1    Optimistic view

3.8.2    Realistic view

3.8.3    Pessimistic view

3.9    Household waste sorting practices

3.9.1    U.S.

3.10    Detailed overview on bin sorting and handling technologies

3.10.1    Selection of Technology

3.10.2    Waste sorting processes & technologies

3.11    Industry impact forces

3.11.1    Growth drivers

3.11.1.1    Innovative waste management practices

3.11.1.2    Continuous economic growth & expanding commercial sector base

3.11.1.3    Rising population

3.11.2    Industry pitfalls & challenges

3.11.2.1    Lack of investments along with availability of an effective SWM regulatory framework

3.12    Porter’s analysis

3.13    Competitive landscape, 2019

3.13.1    Strategy dashboard

3.13.1.1    Waste Connections

3.13.1.2    Hitachi Zosen Corporation

3.13.1.3    Stericycle, Inc.

3.13.1.4    CP Group

3.13.1.5    Suez Environnement

3.13.1.6    Covanta Holding Corporation

3.13.1.7    Clean Harbors

3.13.1.8    Veolia

3.13.1.9    Advanced Disposal Services

3.13.1.10   Waste Management, Inc.

3.14    PESTEL analysis

Browse complete Table of Contents (ToC) of this research report @ https://www.decresearch.com/toc/detail/us-municipal-solid-waste-management-market